Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:41
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Finebaum on House settlement: NCAA dead, Olympic and women sports crushed, football wins - AL.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Do you wear tights for warmth or to make your legs look better?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supernovae may have kicked off abrupt climate shifts in the past—and they could again - Phys.org
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Will Miami’s latest effort at “culture change” work? - NBC Sports
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Shiba Inu risks 18% drop, but whales keep buying – What do they know? - AMBCrypto
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Mondo Duplantis breaks pole vault world record for 12th time - NBC Sports